Minnesota's basic funding formula has lost $600 in value as compared to inflation, according to the Minnesota Department of Education. During this time, however, Minnesota has added a number of unfunded and underfunded mandates to the array of services which Districts must provide. In addition, during this same period, the special education cross subsidy -- the deficit in funding as compared to the total cost of special education mandated services has increased from $321 million per year to $750 million per year. This increase, if funded out of general fund revenues would further decrease the value of the basic formula.
Time for a Public Discussion on Delivering a Constitutionally Adequate education to Minnesota
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Costing an Adequate Education for The Students Minnesota Leaves Behind
This begins a series of posts on why it is critical for Minnesota's three branches of government to study and determine what it woul...
-
On December 13, the Supreme Court delivered its second decision in the years-long Cruz-Guzman case. In the seminal 1993 Skeen v State case...
-
Jvonkorff on Education has been discussing Minnesota's statutory definition of educational adequacy, because adequacy plays an important...
-
The Minnesota Supreme Court's recent Cruz-Guzman decision has radically, (but appropriately), refocused Minnesota's jurisprudence on...
No comments:
Post a Comment
comments welcome