In past blogs, we've discussed Minnesota's growing special education deficit. In our last post, we displayed an MDE chart that makes the point that Minnesota's basic funding formula is losing ground to inflation. These two charts, must be considered together, to get a more accurate understanding of what is happening to school districts. As the special education deficit grows, districts must take more and more money out of their other revenue sources. So, the basic funding formula is lowing ground to inflation, but at the same time, more and more funds are pulled out of basic formula money to help cover the growing special education deficit.
Time for a Public Discussion on Delivering a Constitutionally Adequate education to Minnesota
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Costing an Adequate Education for The Students Minnesota Leaves Behind
This begins a series of posts on why it is critical for Minnesota's three branches of government to study and determine what it woul...
-
On December 13, the Supreme Court delivered its second decision in the years-long Cruz-Guzman case. In the seminal 1993 Skeen v State case...
-
Jvonkorff on Education has been discussing Minnesota's statutory definition of educational adequacy, because adequacy plays an important...
-
The Minnesota Supreme Court's recent Cruz-Guzman decision has radically, (but appropriately), refocused Minnesota's jurisprudence on...