Time for a Public Discussion on Delivering a Constitutionally Adequate education to Minnesota
Monday, November 4, 2019
Minnesotas Growing Special Education Deficit
In past blogs, we've discussed Minnesota's growing special education deficit. In our last post, we displayed an MDE chart that makes the point that Minnesota's basic funding formula is losing ground to inflation. These two charts, must be considered together, to get a more accurate understanding of what is happening to school districts. As the special education deficit grows, districts must take more and more money out of their other revenue sources. So, the basic funding formula is lowing ground to inflation, but at the same time, more and more funds are pulled out of basic formula money to help cover the growing special education deficit.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
High Performing Schools: A description from Michigan 2018 Adequacy Report
The following description is taken from AN EVIDENCE-BASED APPROACH TO SCHOOL FINANCE ADEQUACY IN MICHIGAN: Determining the Cost for Fundin...
-
This begins a series of posts on why it is critical for Minnesota's three branches of government to study and determine what it woul...
-
Jvonkorff on Education has been discussing Minnesota's statutory definition of educational adequacy, because adequacy plays an important...
-
In our last post, we pointed out that the Minnesota Supreme Court's recent Cruz-Guzman decision has radically, (but appropriately), r...