On Wednesday, our school board
will likely to take the next step towards approving several
additions to existing schools in order to accommodate increasing
enrollment in the elementary grades. The purpose of this post is to
provide some background on the enrollment trends that are causing these
additions, and to explain why I believe that it is critical to the
future of our collective communities that we preserve and strengthen
our system of community schools by investing in school expansion and
replacment when the need arises.
Old timers will recall that
back in 1992, the school district constructed three new elementary
schools, Talahi, Discovery and Oak Hill. Partly construction of those schools
reflected a significant change in the population distribution in the
St. Cloud area. Older schools were all placed in an
arc on the north side of St. Cloud from Lincoln and Jefferson, to Washington,
Garfield, Tech, North, Apollo and McKinley. Those schools were located because old St. Cloud's population had
been concentrated heavily towards the northen half of St. Cloud.
As population shifted to the South and Southwest,
these older smaller schools were geographically out of place.
Most of them were much smaller schools, and as a variety of
financial challenges struck the district in the 1980's and 1990's,
these older schools seemed more expensive to run in addition to being
in the wrong place. Three new larger more modern schools were
built to address some of these needs. At the time, the school
district was projecting that enrollment would continue to grow to
11,000 or higher.
During the 1990’s total
enrollment in our school district
fell at a rate of about 200 students per year, however,
resulting in a loss in
revenue of about $1,000,000 per year. Running older partly
empty schools seemed like an unaffordable luxury. After
three years of heated debate in the
community, in 2003, the then school board decided to close Jefferson, Roosevelt and McKinley. They
also gave serious
consideration to closing a fourth smaller elementary school, Lincoln
Elementary. The
closure of those three elementary schools
removed about 849 seats
from our
elementary school capacity.
Starting in about 2007, an enrollment
turnaround began in
the elementary grades. From 2009 to 2014, elementary
enrollment
(including 6th
grade) rose by 694 students or
20%. Enrollment increased for a variety of reasons, but most of the
elementary enrollment increase after 2007 has been concentrated in four
schools:
- Clearview: From 2009-2014 K-6 enrollment at Clearview increased by 132, (about 25%). Clearview's 2017 enrollment is projected to be 250 students higher than its 2007 enrollment. The school is functioning with temporary classrooms. A number of critical functions are being conducted in unacceptably cramped quarters.
- Madison: From 2009 to 2014, Madison Elementary (K-5) grew by 284 students (over 33%). Madison's 2017 enrollment is projected to be 244 higher than its 2007 enrollment, even though it lost its sixth grade to North in 2007.
- Kennedy Elementary: From 2009 to 2014, Kennedy Elementary’s K-6 enrollment increased by 154 (about 30%). Kennedy's 2017 K-6 enrollment is projected to be 235 higher (56%) than its 2007 enrollment. Kennedy's enrollment increase coincided with the construction of a K-8 new Kennedy. Before construction of new Kennedy, many leaders in St. Joseph were calling for formation of an independent school district, because they wanted a community school that would meet their local needs. Construction of the new Kennedy, with its environmental theme, cemented a strong relationship between the district as a whole and the St. Joseph community. ((In the five years from 2009 to 2014, Kennedy’s K-8 enrollment increased by 197 students, and by 2017 itsK-8 enrollment is projected to have doubled from about 400 to 800 students.)
- Lincoln Elementary. Having narrowly escaped the closing decision back in 2003, from 2009 to 2014 Lincoln Elementary’s K-6 enrollment increased by 68 students or 20%, even though it lost its 6th grade. Its K-5- enrollment during that time period increased by 100, or about 33%.
There are many reasons for our school district’s enrollment growth: immigration has played a part. A new post-baby-boom population growth cycle helped reverse the downward trend in population growth. An economy that has made enrollment in private schools more challenging may have caused the return of some families. But without question, an important component in the enrollment growth in our district has been efforts to serve communities with community schools. Where the community has confidence in their community school, enrollment growth is more likely to follow.
The proposals before the Board of Education
represent part of an ongoing building program designed over time to
address the enrollment shifts and enrollment increases. In the past
few years, the district shifted some of our sixth grades into the
junior highs, leading to a middle school configuration that has been
discussed for several decades. But the side benefit of these shifts
was that it delayed for a time the necessity of adding new elementary
space (especially during a time of deep recession). We added
classroom space to Madison Elementary and made small school border
shifts. We added classrooms to South to help accommodate the shift of
6th grades to the middle school configuration, which relieved crowding
pressure on Oak Hill and other elementaries.
We added temporary
classrooms at Clearview to address the marked increase in enrollment
there.
The situation in Clearview
is paralllel to that in St. Joseph several years ago. Clearviews community
is growing, and the enrollment at the school is growing at a rapid
rate. Building a parallel K-8 on the east end of the district has the
prospect of attracting back some of the resident students who were in
the past siphoned away from the district by Annandale and Becker. But
most importantly, the Kennedy experience proves that when our larger
district meets the needs of its constituent communities, our district
is strengthened. When we recognize the needs of our
constituent communities the entire 250 square mile district benefits. Building a K-8 in St. Joseph was one of the wisest decisions our district has made: it restored our bond with the St. Joseph community. It brought back some of the families that had been looking elsewhere for public education. And, it has kept St. Joseph families in our school community through high school
For all of these reasons, I strongly support the K-8 proposal for Clearview, just as I supported the K-8 proposal for St. Joseph.
For all of these reasons, I strongly support the K-8 proposal for Clearview, just as I supported the K-8 proposal for St. Joseph.
No comments:
Post a Comment
comments welcome