Today's Times contains a dialog on whether the people who  raise questions about immigrants in this community and how we  accommodate immigrants in public schools, are motivated by racism or  other venality.   I expressed my views on this topic a few weeks ago in a  post called Time for Courageous Dialog.  Yesterday, Dick Andzenge  broached the subject of whether immigrants expect too much when they  ask for religious accommodations.  That set off another intense and  sometimes highly charged discussion as well.  
I wanted to raise  the flag one more time for my own view, which is that these issues are  more likely to divide us if we don't talk about them openly and with a  good will.   One of the reasons that they fester in our community is  that we fear that discussing them will result in a diatribe of  name-calling.   As my post argues, if we don't discuss these issues, and  confront them openly, then we will leave the public forum exclusively  to the people who get their thrills out of creating division and  hostility.  
This is not white-cloud -- and people who have  concerns about immigration, or diversity issues, are not automatically  racists.  Nor can we attribute the views of one or two Somalis to all  Somalis.   It is racist to accuse all white people in St. Cloud as  subscribing to the views of a few crazy people, just because they are  white.  It is racist to accuse all Somalis of supporting a particular  cause, just because some Somalis do.  
I know, for example, that  many Somalis in this community were appalled when CAIR brought their  charges against the District.  Many of them spoke to me personally and  said, how can we express our disapproval of what CAIR is doing.   Yes, I  believe that most Somalis strongly support the idea that they should be  allowed to pray when their religion calls upon them to pray, or fast  when their religion calls upon them to fast.   But it is not at all  clear that most Somalis wanted CAIR to make this a legal issue, and I  would caution people against assuming that just because a legal group in  Minneapolis has one client who brings a legal claim, that therefore  every Somali thinks that their employer should have been sued.  
These  issues are matters of public significance.   I get questions from  citizens about them all the time.  Often, the citizen expresses some  reluctance to raise the issues that concern them, because they don't  want to give the impression that their motivations arise from prejudice  or hatred.   The people who ask me these questions about what we are  doing and why are typically fine people who haven't an ounce of  prejudice in their veins.  Sometimes white parents are concerned that we  might be less strict with Somali students than White students.   They  have a right to express these concerns, and we cannot respond by saying  that therefore they must be racists.  
The one thing that I have  discovered for sure, is that when I talk to Somali parents they are  largely concerned about the very same thing that non-Somali parents are  concerned about.  They want their children to learn English as soon as  possible.   They want us to maintain a high level of discipline for all  children, and they want discipline to be strictly meted out equally to  all students.   Sometime minority and immigrant parents are concerned  that possibly we are more strict with minority and immigrant students  than white students.  They too have a right to ask these questions and  engage us in dialog.   We demean and destroy that dialog if we  immediately jump to name calling.   
In and among the group of  people asking these questions, may on occasion be a lurking racist, but  we have to stay off of that and work on doing the right thing.   If a  person asks a fair question, its still a fair question, even if they are  asking us for the wrong reasons.   We need to confront these questions  by answering them with courageous dialog.  
Time for a Public Discussion on Delivering a Constitutionally Adequate education to Minnesota
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Fundamental Right to an Adequately Funded Education: The Role of State Standards (Part 2)
This is the second in a series on the Fundamental Right to an Adequately Funded Education in Minnesota as contemplated by the Skeen decision...
- 
Jvonkorff on Education has been discussing Minnesota's statutory definition of educational adequacy, because adequacy plays an important...
- 
This begins a series of posts on why it is critical for Minnesota's three branches of government to study and determine what it woul...
- 
On December 13, the Supreme Court delivered its second decision in the years-long Cruz-Guzman case. In the seminal 1993 Skeen v State case...
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
comments welcome