I woke up this morning to discover that, evidently, I  have failed the "Tripp-test" for having a clue about education issues in  St. Cloud.  I've gotten on the wrong side of some of the self-appointed  civil rights spokespersons in St. Cloud because I don't believe that  constantly focusing on race and racism is a productive strategy for  transforming public education.    I'm not going to shrink from my opinions  on this.    I'm not arguing that we don't need to combat racism in our  community, when it does exist.   I just don't happen to believe that the  "racism is the cause" strategy is effective, or for that matter accurate.
If  you didn't read the story,  my comments in the Times about the actions  of one particular self-described leader of Somalis was interpreted as  proof that I don't have a clue about racial issues in St. Cloud.   My  comments resulted from the fact that the leader in question had agreed  to a meeting to discuss solutions and then over the weekend scheduled  the demonstration for the exact same time as the meeting. I saw this as  regrettable and wrong.  I don't think that it makes you a racist, or  ignorant, just because you disagree with someone who claims to be  speaking on the topic of race.   I'm not going to be bashful about  speaking my mind, just because someone might write a Your Turn against  me.  The stakes are too high here.  The subject is our children and  their education and future.
One of the sad things about the  level of dialog in this community on race is that many people on both  sides of this issue think that if you don't agree with their point of  view that you "don't have a clue."   The result of this approach, which  is all too common, for dialog here around the issue of race, is that we  have trouble actually getting the community mobilized to do the hard  work that is necessary to make systemic change.
My background  and belief system may well differ from that of Mr. Tripp; I can't say,  because he's never bothered to give me a call to find out what I think. I  was a civil rights worker in Mississippi in 1964-1965 when racism kept  black adults from voting and black students from going to decent  schools.     I have a masters in teaching with specialization in  teaching disadvantaged students.  In 1968, I helped found an upward  bound program in Washington, D.C., a program designed to give minority  students a boost into College.  I taught high school in the D.C. public  schools and in New York, before attending law school, after which I  worked six years in legal services for the disadvantaged in the District  of Columbia and then here in Minnesota.  I try to read extensively on  issues relating to the achievement gap, on school reform, and on best  practices.  My background causes me to see the educational crisis quite  differently from Mr. Tripp.  Respectfully, I think that the right  strategy begins with high expectations.
Listen.  The fact that  you disagree with Luke Tripp, or anyone else for that matter, doesn't  mean that you don't have a clue.  It just means that you believe in  following a different path.
Here is what I believe.   I  believe that constantly focusing on the racial divide that allegedly  exists in this community will make it worse, not better.  I believe in  dialog, not invective.  I believe in building bridges of understanding,  not rehashing old grievances.  I believe that the truly great civil  rights leaders of the Martin Luther King era, some of whom I knew, were  peacemakers not rabble-rousers.  They counted their success based on the  amount of healing that they did, not the amount of division that they  created.
I believe that the keys to maintaining a strong public  education system are the same for white and black students.   They  don't begin with focusing on class or racism.  They begin with a  consistent message of high expectations.  The high expectations message  begins in the home.  It begins with a message of "you can do it."  It  begins with a consistent message that hard work paves the road to  success.  It begins with turning off the television and creating a  common time for reading and study.    It begins with reading to your  children daily, and creating an environment of respect for the hard work  that education requires.
I believe too that creating a  welcoming harassment-free environment is important to creating the  conditions for success.  I just don't believe that you do that by  constantly focusing on race and racism.   Kids bully other kids because  the bully feels insecure and channels that insecurity by trying to put  someone down.  Kids pick on kids that they believe are vulnerable--who  they think their peers will let them bully.    For some kids race is an  opportunity to bully.  For others it is a disability, or gender, or an  age difference.  Bullies are all the same; insecure cowards who pick on  kids who they believe are vulnerable.    Inflaming this issue with race  does not, in my opinion, stop bullying.   Maybe you disagree:  if you  do, I won't say that you don't have a clue; I'll just say, I  respectfully disagree.
I believe that raising expectations for  parents, students and teachers is fundamental to improving education for  disadvantaged students.   If Mr. Tripp would bother to take a look, our  district is aggressively working on programs to implement best  practices that provide opportunities for all students, regardless of  race, ethnicity or income.
Earlier this year, a former civil  rights veteran of my era authored a song called "Pants on the Ground."    Maybe you saw it.  It went viral.   In a humorous way, the song was  speaking to the very issue I am talking about.   He was saying, listen,  some of us risked our lives in the 1960's--some of us lost our lives--to  transform this country to provide better opportunities for children of  color.   We haven't driven out racism completely, and we need to work on  that, of course.  But, I believe he was saying, look at the  opportunities that you now have, as the result of the sacrifices of  King, Schwerner, Goodman, Cheney, the church bombings, the cross  burnings, and the beatings and brutality.  Stop focusing on excuses:   get to work.  The opportunities are there.  Study hard.   Get to work.   Overcome.
The road to better education in St. Cloud right now  does not begin with demonstrations or anti-racism invective.   It begins  with mobilizing parents to become involved in their public schools.  It  begins with encouraging parents to become involved in their children's  education.  It begins with supporting teachers and schools.    If you  don't agree with that, well ok.  But that is my "clue": for making  things better.
Time for a Public Discussion on Delivering a Constitutionally Adequate education to Minnesota
Saturday, April 10, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Fundamental Right to an Adequately Funded Education: The Role of State Standards (Part 2)
This is the second in a series on the Fundamental Right to an Adequately Funded Education in Minnesota as contemplated by the Skeen decision...
- 
Jvonkorff on Education has been discussing Minnesota's statutory definition of educational adequacy, because adequacy plays an important...
- 
This begins a series of posts on why it is critical for Minnesota's three branches of government to study and determine what it woul...
- 
On December 13, the Supreme Court delivered its second decision in the years-long Cruz-Guzman case. In the seminal 1993 Skeen v State case...
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
comments welcome